first things first - gracias to erin for hosting the viewing suaret. and joy and kelli - always a pleasure.
the evening started with the e! red carpet show. i was eagerly awaiting isaac mizrahi's pre-show antics, but alas, i was completely disappointed. there was no groping of scarlett johanssen, no looking down teri hatcher's dress, or discussion with queen latifah about her spanks. what a disappointment. but as isaac and his boyfriend ryan seacrest both mentioned, he had been warned. sadness.
at least there were plenty of celebrities to pick on in the comfort of erin's apartment with plenty of junk food to go around.
what the heck was wrong with charlize theron and michelle williams? who let them out of the house like that?? jessica alba looked gorgeous, although i would have thought celebrities could afford better tattoos. and was i the only one surprised that sandra bullock and keanu reeves showed up together? e! host giuliana depandi had a terrible dress seam (making it look like it was very very cold), and naomi watts should have tried a little harder to make heath regret his jump to michelle--unless curtains really turn him on. come to think of it, that's what michelle was wearing too. thank heavens for the saving graces; eric bana, george clooney, and jake gyllenhall, who were looking mighty good. and felicity huffman looked stunning.
the oscars themselves started off well, with an entertaining sequence (seen below). you might want to scroll to the bottom of the page and pause the background music before you hit play.
but after that, there weren't a lot of highlights. the gay cowboy montage provided a good laugh (also included in the above clip), but the other 19 montages fell flat. hmm...wonder why these things always go long...
i digress.
there did come a very tense moment when kelli and i nearly came to blows over the importance of 'grease' to the human race. but fortunately, we were able to find common ground on the sheer awfulness of 'gone with the wind.' phew!
mostly the show was interesting to me because the company was good, and my competitive nature kicked in. i was crossing my fingers that i would win our little oscar pool. when 'picking' the winners, i was sometimes torn by those i thought would win, and those i just really really hoped for. i shot for a balance of the two and did okay. as previously mentioned, i was surprised that brokeback didn't win more. i was also a little surprised reese actually won best actress (despite being the favorite), and the biggest, most wonderful shock of the evening was crash's best picture win. well deserved in my book.
i'm still tired, and i don't know if take two was any more interesting/informative than take one, but at least you can watch the opening sequence again, right?
4 comments:
hey now. don't be disrespectin' Margaret Mitchell.
don't worry, it wasn't a personal attack on margaret mitchell, just a general attack on everything about the movie;)
An attack on Gone with the Wind is a personal attack on MM.
Actually the book is awesome, the movie....well, I enjoy its flamboyancy. Some don't appreciate that apparently.
i can appreciate flamboyancy in some of it's manifestations..ross the intern, for example. but no. not in gone with the wind.
i don't even feel like caveating my statements with the fact that i was 13 and it came on around 12:30am and my dad forced me to watch it, which may be the only reason i hate it. oh wait..then there's that scarlett broad. okay, i definitely hate it:)
sorry joy, i just can't be won over on this one...can we find some neutral territory? how do you feel about 'grease'? ;)
Post a Comment